Dan Wilson — Feb 13, 2026
Attendees: Thomas, Michael, Dan Duration: ~32 min
1. PREMERA UPDATE
Thomas shared the outcome of yesterday's Premera meeting (with their head of analytics and AI data team):
- Landing on FDE consulting work. 3-6 months of embedded "PhD work" — learning their systems, understanding their needs.
- Rate proposed: $150/hr for ~40 hrs/week. Proposal sent, expect response early next week.
- Enterprise product contracting in parallel. Premera said even if we wanted to, enterprise procurement takes 6-9 months through security, review, permissions.
- Two specific workstreams revealed:
- Auto-auth: Accelerating automated authorizations (MCG/United have versions of this)
- Appeals processing: Premera is ~12 months behind on the provider appeal AI wave. Getting slammed with AI-generated appeals. Need help making the process more efficient.
- Access level: Will be permissioned like employees. Significant data and system access.
Dan's reaction:
- "That's a great outcome for you guys honestly. You're going to get paid to go to school."
- Contractor access vs. vendor access is "180 degrees different" — as a vendor they'd expect you to have all the answers.
- $150/hr is fair/market. If they counter at $130, take it. Even $100 is still $200K/year per person.
2. TAX & CORPORATE STRUCTURE ADVICE
- As a C Corp, consulting income gets double-taxed. Consider an S Corp or LLC subsidiary for the consulting revenue.
- S Corp / LLC: pay yourself a minimal salary ($40K), dividend the rest quarterly — much better tax treatment.
- Talk to your tax person about whether this makes sense.
- "It might be complicated but it might be a situation where you want to do some kind of subsidiary that's taxed differently."
3. STOCHASTIC / CORAL HEALTH — APPEALS CONVERGENCE
Dan is building an appeal letter generator with Coral Health through his Stochastic work:
- Getting all payer decisions to tune the model
- This is the opposite side of what Premera wants help with (provider attacking vs. payer defending)
- "There might be a scenario where we collaborate around that"
- Don't want to waste time rebuilding if IP can be repurposed
- Some of the IP could be built outside the Premera relationship — need to figure out what makes sense
4. THE VISION — TRANSACTION CLEARING
Dan articulated the end-state vision clearly:
- Think of auth like financial transactions. If both sides are on the same toolset, "for the love of God, can we just clear the transaction more efficiently?"
- But: "What I learned with Moxe is you can't build the end to end and expect both sides to adopt it together."
- Each side has to be valuable independently first.
- Finance analogy: get enough buyers and sellers, then clear the transaction and take both sides of the spread.
- Advice: Keep going at payer side, forget provider for now. But make architectural decisions with the eventual bridge in mind. Build a business model around the idea that you'll eventually get there — "don't screw the other side of the transaction. That'll put you on the right side of history."
5. THE NEWCO CONCEPT (Evolved from Feb 11 Merger Idea)
Dan's thinking has evolved from a straight merger:
- Envisions a "NewCo" that's an FDE services business
- Partners with Stochastic for platform/tech — when DaisyAI hits a technical ceiling, Stochastic builds the abstracted capability
- DaisyAI focuses on workflow, agents, domain-specific stuff — not building pipelines for 75 document types
- Targets RCM opportunities on both sides of payer/provider
- Key tension he's wrestling with: one company vs. distinct businesses?
- All-in-one = suboptimal cost allocation, can't amortize tech the same way
- If Stochastic isn't the best tool for a specific job, you need flexibility to use something better
- "Intertwined economics but independent operations"
- Not finalized with Glenn at Stochastic — "this is the head of Dan"
- Needs more time to "turn more cards" — what Thomas and Michael are doing with Premera buys that time
6. TEAM OF 5 UPDATE
- They're going to shut down or sell in the next ~2 months
- Open to acqui-hire: a few million, mostly earnout + vested equity
- Dan's thinking: structure a deal where you get the IP + them long enough to integrate, but don't overindex on them being the forever anchor team
- "I'm gun shy given the fact that they are quitting because they gave themselves a year"
- Andrew is the commercial guy, plus a product guy and clinical data engineers
- If Premera scope grows, could potentially hire them as contractors through DaisyAI and arbitrage (bill $150, pay $75)
7. DAN STARTS AS CTO OF SUMMA HEALTH (Monday!)
- 3-month contract as outside CIO of Summa Health (hospital system in Akron, OH)
- Brought in by General Catalyst through the Percepta relationship
- GC/Percepta has been frustrated: months of work and they can't get a single LLM provisioned within Summa's infrastructure
- Dan's role: go inside Summa and "clear the way" for Percepta's work to actually happen
- Reports to CEO and CFO of Summa, but brought in by GC
- Thomas connection: Abhinav (Percepta, close friend from school) and Lipsa are both at Summa doing call center work
- Dan: "In about three months from now, I think all of us are going to have collectively a lot more insight"
- Will test whether the Palantir-esque FDE model works in healthcare
8. FUNDRAISING PUSHBACK
Dan pushed hard against raising right now:
- "Why would you fundraise right now if you've got the FDE thing? What do you need the money for?"
- At $150/hr you can pay yourself properly — that's the insurance you need
- Better time to raise: After coming out of Premera with a product built on real learnings, in use at a health plan, with a pipeline. "Here's our pipeline — that would be a much more successful capital raise."
- AI startup space is crowded. Investors proxy on revenue. Without revenue, it's just a call option.
- Fundraising takes minimum 3 months — "you're going to be trying to do that while really what you should be doing is 100% focused on crushing the Premera opportunity"
- "Leave nothing on the table over there"
- Alternative: Try to get more money from Premera — expand to 4-5 person scope, get expense reimbursement for dev platforms, bundle operating costs in
- If fundraising is easy and pricing is good, "then take the money"
- Offered to invest: "Send me the deck and I may invest"
Thomas's response: "I don't think we've gotten the feedback to not do the fundraise yet, but I think given we just sent this contract off this week... maybe the reality of revenue coming sooner than we expected might give us more optionality."
9. IP PROTECTION REMINDER
- "Make sure you've got the right protections around IP residuals"
- Use separate computers for Premera work vs. DaisyAI work
- Everything in your head is your IP if developed without Premera IP
- Define background IP / foreground IP clearly in the contract
- "You want to have a place to do stuff that's super clean"
Action Items
- Review Premera contract for IP protections (background IP, residuals, separate dev environments)
- Talk to tax advisor about S Corp / LLC subsidiary for consulting income
- Seriously evaluate pausing fundraise to focus on Premera
- Thomas: say hi to Abhinav at Percepta/Summa
- If Premera scope grows, explore bringing team of 5 as contractors
- Stay tight with Dan through Summa stint — convergence in ~3 months
- Dan offered to invest — send deck when ready
People Discussed
| Person | Context |
|---|---|
| Glenn | Stochastic founder, Dan's tech partner |
| Andrew | Commercial guy with the team of 5 |
| Abhinav | Thomas's friend at Percepta/GC, doing call center work at Summa |
| Lipsa | Also at Percepta, at Summa |
| Team of 5 | Ex-Change Healthcare, shutting down in ~2 months |
Strategic Takeaways
- Revenue > fundraise right now. The Premera contract changes the calculus. Dan's pushback is the strongest signal yet to deprioritize the raise.
- The NewCo concept is still half-baked but directionally interesting. DaisyAI as FDE services + Stochastic as platform partner. Need Glenn's buy-in.
- Appeals is a live opportunity on both sides. Dan building provider-side appeal letters, Premera wants payer-side appeal defense. Collaboration potential is real.
- Summa/Percepta will be a case study. If GC's FDE model can't even get an LLM provisioned, that says a lot about the market reality.
- The team of 5 has a ~2 month window. If we want the IP, the clock is ticking. But the Premera work comes first.